<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Articles</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Dublin Institute of Technology All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://arrow.dit.ie/clsart</link>
<description>Recent documents in Articles</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 10:24:53 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>Die entwicklung der subjektivität des verbrauchers in Irland von 1900 bis 1980</title>
<link>http://arrow.dit.ie/clsart/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://arrow.dit.ie/clsart/8</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 05:33:27 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Paddy Dolan</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Of Discipline and Civilization: a Roundtable Discussion on the Legacies of Norbert Elias and Michel Foucault</title>
<link>http://arrow.dit.ie/clsart/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://arrow.dit.ie/clsart/7</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 06:25:48 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>When one considers the proximity of their concerns, it is perhaps surprising that the works of Norbert Elias and Michel Foucault have not been more systematically compared and discussed. However, the differentiation of disciplinary knowledge (particularly the boundary that separates philosophy from social theory), com-pounded by parochialisms fostered by the cult of the intellectual, have delayed this process far past its due. This conversation, which began in 2008 at a conference on the works of Elias and Foucault at the University of Hamburg, is, in this regard, an effort to make up for lost time. Fashioned from hours of discussion recorded on an afternoon at the University of Amsterdam in June 2009, (enriched and clarified by the editor and participants in several rounds of polishing and revision), the discus-sion that follows seeks to draw out conflicts and convergences between the trajecto-ries of thought we know as Eliasian and Foucauldian.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Sam Binkley et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Figurational Dynamics and Parliamentary Discourses of Living Standards in Ireland</title>
<link>http://arrow.dit.ie/clsart/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://arrow.dit.ie/clsart/5</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 06:33:39 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>While the concept of living standards remains central to political debate, it has become marginal in sociological research compared to the burgeoning attention given to the topic of consumer culture in recent decades. However, they both concern how one does and should consume, and, indeed, behave at particular times. I use the theories of Norbert Elias to explain the unplanned but structured (ordered) changes in expected standards of living over time. This figurational approach is compared to other alternative explanations, particularly those advanced by Bourdieu, Veblen and Baudrillard. Though these offer some parallels with Elias’s theories, I argue that consumption standards are produced and transformed through the changing dependencies and power relations between social classes. They cannot be reduced to the intentions, interests or ambitions of particular elites, nor to the needs of social systems. Using qualitative data from parliamentary debates in Ireland to trace changing norms and ideals of consumption, as well as historical data to reconstruct shifts in social interdependencies, I further contend that discourses of living standards and luxury are vital aspects of the growing identification and empathy between classes, which in turn encourages greater global integration in the face of emigration and national decline.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Paddy Dolan</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Space, Time and the Constitution of Subjectivity: Comparing Elias and Foucault</title>
<link>http://arrow.dit.ie/clsart/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://arrow.dit.ie/clsart/4</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:19:05 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The work of Foucault and Elias has been compared before in the social sciences and humanities, but here I argue that the main distinction between their approaches to the construction of subjectivity is the relative importance of space and time in their accounts.  This is not just a matter of the “history of ideas,” as providing for the temporal dimension more fully in theories of subjectivity and the habitus allows for a greater understanding of how ways of being, acting and feeling in different spaces are related but largely unintended.  Here I argue that discursive practices, governmental operations and technologies of the self (explanatory claims of both Foucault and the Foucauldian tradition) take shape as processes within the continuities of the figurational flow connecting people across space and time. Continuity should not be understood as stability or sameness over time, but as the contingent relations between successive social formations.  As Elias argues, there is a structure or order to long-term social change, albeit unplanned, and this ultimately provides the broader social explanation for the historicity of the subject.  Though discursive practices happen in particular spaces, we must recognise these spaces, and the practices therein, as socially constructed over time in response to largely unplanned moral and cultural developments.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Paddy Dolan</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Civilizing of Hurling in Ireland</title>
<link>http://arrow.dit.ie/clsart/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://arrow.dit.ie/clsart/3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 01:33:37 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This essay examines the sport of hurling in Ireland through the theoretical framework of sport and leisure developed by Elias and Dunning. Through an analysis of newspaper reports of games, of rulebooks and codes of play, as well as historical data on increasing social differentiation and integration, we argue that hurling has undergone sportization and civilizing processes. However, due to the unevenness of wider figurational shifts these processes have been non-linear and fragile. Gradually, we see increasing numbers of rules, as well as increasing severity of punishment for the breaking of specific rules relating to violent play. The level and extent of violent conduct also appears to change with both players and spectators becoming more self-controlled. The increasing emotional restraint of spectators and players can be explained by the changes in the overall structure of Irish society during this period, particularly from the 1960s onwards with increasing interdependencies between people.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Paddy Dolan et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Sustainability of Sustainable Consumption</title>
<link>http://arrow.dit.ie/clsart/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://arrow.dit.ie/clsart/2</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 01:33:36 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This article examines the limitations of the concept of sustainable consumption in terms of the inadequate attention given to the social, cultural and historical contextualization of consumption.  I argue that Macromarketing should adopt modes of inquiry that more fully engage with this contextualization.  The implicit assumptions of ‘sustainable consumption’ center on the rational individual and his or her needs and wants, and neglect the significance of consumption practices as embodying the relations between individuals. Acts of consumption are not in opposition to, and prior to, macro structures and processes, they are macro processes at work.  Consumer practices are cultural and social practices that have historically developed, and are manifestations of both local and global linkages of social interdependencies.  To continually look at the consumer as the cause of the ecological problem effectively decontextualizes consumption from such interdependencies.  It posits a macro problem onto a micro situation and seeks the solution there.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Paddy Dolan</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Developing Consumer Subjectivity in Ireland: 1900-80</title>
<link>http://arrow.dit.ie/clsart/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://arrow.dit.ie/clsart/1</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 07:05:48 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The development of consumer subjectivity cannot be solely understood in terms of the intentions, strategies and discursive practices emanating from diverse power centres. Following Elias, and using Ireland as an empirical case, the consumer is presented as undergoing a shift along a continuum of We–I balances towards the latter pole. This occurs within the context of increasing social interdependencies, functional specialization and social integration. Through complex, unplanned social processes over time, the consumer is seen more individualistically. I conclude by suggesting that there are opportunities to synthesize figurational and Foucauldian approaches to consumer subjectivity once long-term social change is prioritized.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Paddy Dolan</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>
