<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Conference Papers</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Dublin Institute of Technology All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://arrow.dit.ie/beschspcon</link>
<description>Recent documents in Conference Papers</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 09:59:12 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>To Gauge an Understanding of How Boundaries are Perceived in Ireland by Landowners</title>
<link>http://arrow.dit.ie/beschspcon/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://arrow.dit.ie/beschspcon/3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 09:45:11 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Recent anecdotal evidence from property professionals indicates that there has been a significant increase in boundary disputes in Ireland since the phased publication of the Land Registry digital map in 2005. There is a need to investigate this development in order to confirm or refute this trend and attempt to identify the issues causing these disputes. There is an absence of detailed information on the causes and types of boundary disputes within the Irish Legal system. This project aims to address this lack of information by collecting comprehensive information on a range of case studies over the past 5 years and determine the incidence of these types of disputes. The cost to all parties to these disputes will also be estimated to inform policy makers of the effectiveness of the current system. An electronic questionnaire on boundaries in general, was carried out to gauge the perception and context in which property boundaries are perceived in Ireland by landowners. Initial results from this first questionnaire show that 32% and 38% of landowners in urban and rural areas respectively have issues with their boundaries, and 22% of landowners did not know whether their property is registered in Land Registry or in Registry of Deeds. A second questionnaire, currently in progress, intends collecting information on specific boundary dispute cases to determine the issues causing these disputes and identify the various types of disputes within this litigation category. This study hopes to inform the need for policy reform of the Land Administration System for land tenure in Ireland.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Daragh O&apos;Brien et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Harnessing Developments in Technology and Merging them with new Approaches to Teaching: a Practical Example of the Effective use of Wikis and Social Bookmarking Sites in 3rd Level Professional Education</title>
<link>http://arrow.dit.ie/beschspcon/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://arrow.dit.ie/beschspcon/2</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 02:01:24 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>While innovations such as Problem-Based Learning and elearning have  informed pedagogical practice on the Geomatics honours Bachelor of  Science degree programme at the Department of Spatial Information  Sciences, Dublin Institute of Technology (DIT), Ireland, few attempts  have been made to date to harness technological developments and merge  them with new approaches to teaching. However, the recent conceptual change in authoring and usage of the  World Wide Web from relatively static to fully interactive (Read-Write  Web) provided an opportunity to embrace a change in technology as a  means of modifying teaching practice to create a more student-centred  environment. This paper describes a project currently running at the DIT, with 2nd  year students on the aforementioned four-year honours degree programme  in Geomatics, where the students are required to use Web 2.0 sites for  social bookmarking (www.delicious.com) and wiki creation  (www.pbwiki.com) to enable collaborative research and writing, in the  context of a module on introductory level remote sensing. No prior  knowledge of wikis or social bookmarking sites is expected and  instruction in the usage of these tools is an integral part of the task. The students have been divided into small groups of four or five, given  specific and independent tasks to accomplish, and given full autonomy in  how elements of the task were subdivided. This particular arrangement  has resulted in the emergence of a number of interesting organisational  strategies within the groups, the practical details of which will be  discussed during this paper. Through appropriate weighting of this task within the overall module  students have been given the opportunity to become accustomed to the new  form of teaching and learning, with its potential for confusion or  misinterpretation caused by unfamiliarity, without needing to worry  about potentially significant assessment penalties. The usage of online  sites, which are accessible to the students only through unique logins  or identifiers, has made individual assessment within groups  significantly easier and more successful than was previously possible. Initial student feedback has been very positive, indicating that this  method of learning is seen as interesting, challenging and effective,  and that it is very fair in ensuring that  non-contributing group  members are not carried; a matter which is of significant concern to  many hard-working students.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Avril Behan et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Evaluation of the Role of an Intensive Induction Project in Enhancing the First Year Experience</title>
<link>http://arrow.dit.ie/beschspcon/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://arrow.dit.ie/beschspcon/1</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 02:01:22 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In line with increasing global efforts to improve the first year  experience of 3rd level education Dublin Institute of Technology’s  School of Spatial Planning undertook, in both 2007 and 2008, a 2-day  Deep-End Induction project. With the introduction of modularisation in  Ireland’s Institutes of Technology opportunities arose for the  identification of overlaps and synergies between programmes. Within the  authors’ School three honours Bachelor of Science degrees in Geomatics,  Spatial Planning and Environmental Management are taught annually. The  Geomatics graduates are mainly engaged in the production of maps and  models on national, regional and local scale as well as the management  of spatial data in Geographic Information Systems and through  appropriate Land Management processes. The Environmental Managers and  Spatial Planners are prime users of these datasets. All three student  groups benefit from the development of an understanding of each of the  other disciplines and this led to the introduction of basic modules in  each of the three subject areas, delivered jointly to the three cohorts  during semester one of the first year. Experience in the first year of  joint delivery of modules (2006) indicated that students had difficulty  understanding the relevance of these modules and the reasoning behind  the joint delivery. It was also found that few students mixed outside  their own cohort even when scheduled in cross-disciplinary teams for  assignments and practical work. In an effort to address this issue staff developed an induction project  which placed students from the three programmes into teams and tasked  them with the design of a route for a high-voltage power line. The students were given a detailed briefing (both en masse and in  separate cohorts to explain the specific role of each professional in  the design team), were provided with a range of online Irish mapping,  environmental and planning tools, and were required to design, visit and  evaluate two possible routes to match specific natural, social,  engineering or landscape criteria between defined start and end  locations. The deliverables were a brief report and a presentation proposing one of  the designed routes. The presentation was made to the full cohort of  students and staff from across the school and was delivered as if at a  Planning Consultation meeting, with each group in turn taking the role  of the design team trying to convince an audience of interested local  parties of the benefits of their proposal. The real outcomes, however, were the introduction of students to their  cohort and the wider grouping of students across the school, to the  related disciplines of Spatial Planning, Environmental Management and  Geomatics, to a range of tools (both educational, such as the Webcourses  VLE, and subject specific), to staff at the school and to some 3rd  level teaching methods. Feedback from students indicated that they found the project to be a  success, both from social and educational perspectives, with the  Geomatics students seeing less educational and more social relevance,  possibly because of the specific topic chosen for investigation. Current  anecdotal evidence has shown better mixing between cohorts during joint  practical and project work. The authors also intend to carry out a  further evaluation of results of the induction project when the students  have completed one full stage (2 semesters) of their programmes.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Avril Behan et al.</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>
